To The Point

Welcome to To The Point's blog. Warren Olney's To The Point is following the stories beyond the soundbites. Keep checking back here for curated news and shows.

Interested in Los Angeles local politics?
Producers
Recent Tweets @tothepoint_kcrw
Posts tagged "politics"

Jonathan Alter, author of “The Center Holds: Obama and His Enemies,” talks about President Obama’s inability to schmooze on today’s “To the Point.”

Neither I, nor any President, can promise the total defeat of terror. We will never erase the evil that lies in the hearts of some human beings, nor stamp out every danger to our open society. What we can do – what we must do – is dismantle networks that pose a direct danger, and make it less likely for new groups to gain a foothold, all while maintaining the freedoms and ideals that we defend. To define that strategy, we must make decisions based not on fear, but hard-earned wisdom. And that begins with understanding the threat we face.
President Obama speaking about US counterterrorism policy, the use of drones and Guantanamo. Here’s the transcript.

From AP: An elementary school student suggests that guns should only shoot chocolate bullets. Biden responds. 

Good backgrounder on the IRS scandal

Daily Beast’s Michael Tomasky on gun control.

How stupid does the Senate background-check vote look now, I ask the pundits and others who thought it was dumb politics for Obama and the Democrats to push for a vote that they obviously knew they were going to lose. I’d say not very stupid at all. The nosedive taken in the polls by a number of senators who voted against the bill, most of them in red states, makes public sentiment here crystal clear. And now, for the first time since arguably right after the Reagan assassination attempt—a damn long time, in other words—legislators in Washington are feeling political heat on guns that isn’t coming from the NRA. This bill will come back to the Senate, maybe before the August recess, and it already seems possible and maybe even likely to have 60 votes next time.

America’s 43rd President now has the country’s 13th presidential library. The George W. Bush Presidential Centerhouses the bullhorn from Ground Zero, the pistol from Saddam Hussein’s spider hole and a statue of two favorite dogs. How much is there on missing weapons of mass destruction or Wall Street bailouts? Do Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld or Karl Rove get much attention? Every president since FDR has a similar mix of historical fact and self-serving propaganda assembled on his behalf. We look at the contents, the architecture and the symbolism of Bush’s Center in Dallas and at the role of presidential libraries in our political life.  

The detainees, after years of being quiet and waiting for the process to work itself out, with the Obama administration and so-forth, have come to realize that the process is jammed-up.

- Charlie Savage, Washington correspondent for the New York Times, on hunger strikes in Camp 6 at Guantanamo Bay Prison

“The point really is not whether you keep Guantanamo [Prison] open or keep it closed. The point is what you do with those you have there.”

- President of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a research institute focusing on terrorism that was created in the wake of the attacks on September 11.

Today’s To the Point on hunger strikes at Guantanamo Prison. 
He will not be treated as an enemy combatant,” Carney said at Monday’s press briefing. “We will prosecute this terrorist through our civilian system of justice.

“Women’s rights now depend on their ZIP code,” according to Planned Parenthood, as more states pass restrictions and outright bans on abortion. Mississippi, Alabama, Kansas and North Dakota are closest to making abortion impossible – 40 years after Roe v. Wade declared it a constitutional right. Why do women want abortions?  What happens when they can’t get them?  What are the consequences when unwanted babies are born? Is the current movement about the politics of Red States, or a real effort to repeal Roe v. Wade?

Via Talking Points Memo:

“a study released Monday showed that media coverage of a woman candidate’s appearance actually makes people less likely to vote for her — even if the comments are positive.”